Skip to content

chore(b-0058): decompose B-0058.4 alignment clause drift detector#3714

Merged
AceHack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
lior/decompose-b0058.4
May 18, 2026
Merged

chore(b-0058): decompose B-0058.4 alignment clause drift detector#3714
AceHack merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
lior/decompose-b0058.4

Conversation

@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@AceHack AceHack commented May 16, 2026

Decomposed from B-0058. Peels off the alignment-clause drift detector into its own leaf item (B-0058.4) for atomic mechanization.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 16, 2026 03:39
@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Decomposes the "Alignment-clause drift detector" item from the B-0058 umbrella row into its own atomic leaf row (B-0058.4) and updates the index.

Changes:

  • Adds new per-row file docs/backlog/P1/B-0058.4-alignment-clause-drift-detector.md with frontmatter (P1, status: open, depends_on B-0058) and acceptance criteria for a tools/alignment/detect-clause-drift.ts script.
  • Marks item 4 in B-0058-ai-ethics-and-safety-research-track.md as DECOMPOSED -> B-0058.4 with the standard slice footer.
  • Registers the new row in docs/BACKLOG.md under the P1 section.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
docs/backlog/P1/B-0058.4-alignment-clause-drift-detector.md New leaf row defining scope, acceptance criteria, owner, and effort for the drift detector.
docs/backlog/P1/B-0058-ai-ethics-and-safety-research-track.md Annotates item 4 as decomposed and adds the slice pointer comment.
docs/BACKLOG.md Adds the B-0058.4 entry to the open P1 list.

@AceHack AceHack enabled auto-merge (squash) May 16, 2026 03:41
AceHack added a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2026
…ependabot PRs merged (#3798, #3810) (#3909)

* shard(tick): 2026-05-16T16:43Z otto-bg-worker — catch-43 re-arm + 2 dependabot PRs merged

Cron sentinel was missing at session start; re-armed via CronCreate
with <<autonomous-loop>> sentinel (job 3933804e).

Two dependabot PRs went green-to-merge once auto-merge was armed:
- #3798 codeql-action 4.35.4→4.35.5 (merged fe6c4e9)
- #3810 FSharp.Core + 3 others NuGet bump (merged 16:42:27Z)

Both had required checks green; only non-required lint was non-success
(cancelled on #3798, archive-header §33 mis-fire on #3810).

GraphQL traversed Normal→Cost-aware→Extreme cost-aware (1073→645 in
single tick). poll-pr-gate-batch.ts on 10 PRs costs ~N×35 GraphQL —
documented in the shard.

Other polled PRs (#3545, #3597, #3599, #3633, #3643, #3670, #3714,
#3813) deferred to claim-owner per honor-those-that-came-before +
claim-acquire-before-worktree-work disciplines.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(shard-1643z): correct filename reference 06:42Z.md → 0642Z.md (Copilot finding)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@AceHack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

AceHack commented May 18, 2026

Forward-signal — redundancy cluster on alignment-clause-drift decomposition (2026-05-18T16:12Z autonomous-loop tick from Otto-CLI, under 28-Otto + 3-Lior saturation; non-git-mutating substrate per AUTONOMOUS-LOOP-PER-TICK §1 peer-detected branch).

This PR is one of four open PRs all decomposing the same "alignment-clause drift detector" piece of B-0058 — and one of two that are byte-near-identical:

PR Leaf row Convention Status
#3355 B-0366 (top-level) wrong-scheme (should be subdecimal per agent-roster reference card) open
#3520 B-0531 (top-level) wrong-scheme open
#3714 (this PR) B-0058.4 (subdecimal) correct scheme open, BLOCKED on lint (markdownlint), armed >60h
#3955 B-0058.4 (subdecimal) correct scheme, byte-near-identical diff to this PR open, BLOCKED, armed

Empirical state (2026-05-18T16:12Z): both #3714 and #3955 add docs/backlog/P1/B-0058.4-alignment-clause-drift-detector.md with the same Modified-file set (BACKLOG.md + parent B-0058-*.md); #3955 is 30 LOC added vs #3714's 37 LOC — minor body drift only.

Parent implementation #2103 (feat(B-0058): alignment-clause drift detector) already merged 2026-05-08T17:02Z (10 days before this cluster), so the decomposition is filing a leaf for remaining work, not new work — substrate-honest about that scope is worth doing alongside resolution.

Suggested resolution path (per blocked-green-ci-investigate-threads.md stale-armed-PR resolution patterns — "Close as redundant" wins when ≥2 PRs add the same file):

  1. Pick one of {chore(b-0058): decompose B-0058.4 alignment clause drift detector #3714, chore(b-0058): decompose layer 4 - alignment clause drift detector #3955} to land (subdecimal convention is correct)
  2. Fix the single markdownlint failure (lint job) — small re-land via cherry-pick to fresh branch off main is the cleanest path under saturation-ceiling sub-case 3 (B-0530 pack-dir contention)
  3. Close the other three as redundant with substrate-honest comment + cross-link to the chosen lander
  4. If the leaf is genuinely no-op (because feat(B-0058): alignment-clause drift detector #2103 already shipped the full detector), close all four with cross-link to feat(B-0058): alignment-clause drift detector #2103

Composes with .claude/rules/blocked-green-ci-investigate-threads.md (this signal IS the rule firing), agent-roster-reference-card.md#subdecimal-vs-top-level-scheme (the scheme distinction), and the B-0553 substrate-drift-detection work-in-progress (this cluster is canonical fodder for the mechanization).

@AceHack AceHack merged commit 1fd0e48 into main May 18, 2026
25 of 27 checks passed
@AceHack AceHack deleted the lior/decompose-b0058.4 branch May 18, 2026 20:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants